3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 vs NA330

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 vs Philips NA330

What Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 does better (2) and where NA330 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$80
vs
Philips NA330
Philips · 2024NA330
7.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
5.6Power & capacity5.2
2.5Versatility8.9
7.9Controls & convenience6.8

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 better than NA330?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is NA330 better than Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500?

  1. Power1,500 W vs 1,700 W+13%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l vs 6.2 l+13%
  3. BakingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500: Yes
  4. Grill functionNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500: Yes
  5. DehydratingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA330Philips NA330≈ US$857.4
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l6.2 l
Automatic programmes9—
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Width—324 mm
Height—303 mm
Depth—436 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare