3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 vs NA229

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 vs Philips NA229

What Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 does better (1) and where NA229 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$50
vs
Philips NA229
Philips · 2024NA229
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ US$60
Higher score
4.5Power & capacity4.0
2.5Versatility9.3
7.9Controls & convenience9.6

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 better than NA229?

  1. Viewing windowYes · NA229: No

Why is NA229 better than Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000: Yes
  2. Power1,400 W vs 1,500 W+7%
  3. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 4.2 l+5%
  4. Min. temperature80 °C vs 40 °C2×
  5. BakingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000: Yes
  6. Grill functionNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000: Yes
  7. Keep warmNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000: Yes
  8. Non-stick coatingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA229Philips NA229≈ US$608.3
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes9—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C40 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—273 mm
Height—292 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare