3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 vs NA130

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 vs Philips NA130

What Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 does better (2) and where NA130 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$50
vs
Philips NA130
Philips · 2024NA130
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$60
Higher score
4.5Power & capacity5.2
7.9Controls & convenience5.1

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000 better than NA130?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is NA130 better than Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 6.2 l+55%
  2. Power1,400 W vs 1,700 W+21%
  3. Non-stick coatingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 4000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA130Philips NA130≈ US$605.8
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l6.2 l
Automatic programmes9—
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
SteamingNo—
BakingNo—
Grill functionNo—
DehydratingNo—
Keep warmNo—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—309 mm
Height—308 mm
Depth—404 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare