2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 vs NA229

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 vs Philips NA229

What Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 does better (0) and where NA229 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
5.1Score
0 advantages≈ US$65
vs
Philips NA229
Philips · 2024NA229
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ US$60
Higher score
4.5Power & capacity4.0
2.5Versatility9.3
5.6Controls & convenience9.6

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 better than NA229?

Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NA229 better than Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: Yes
  2. Power1,400 W vs 1,500 W+7%
  3. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 4.2 l+5%
  4. Min. temperature80 °C vs 40 °C2×
  5. BakingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: Yes
  6. Grill functionNo · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: Yes
  7. Keep warmNo · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: Yes
  8. Non-stick coatingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA229Philips NA229≈ US$608.3
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes9—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C40 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—273 mm
Height—292 mm
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare