3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 vs NA120

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 vs Philips NA120

What Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 does better (1) and where NA120 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
5.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$65
vs
Philips NA120
Philips · 2024NA120
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
4.5Power & capacity4.0
2.5Versatility7.6
5.7Controls & convenience4.3

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 better than NA120?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD

Why is NA120 better than Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,500 W+7%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 4.2 l+5%
  3. BakingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: Yes
  4. Grill functionNo · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA120Philips NA120≈ US$655.4
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes9—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—368 mm
Height—293 mm
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare