2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch vs 348113

Cecotec Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch vs StarQ 348113

What Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch does better (0) and where 348113 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch
4.4Score
0 advantages≈ US$40
vs
StarQ 348113
StarQ · 2022348113
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$35
Higher score
4.3Power & capacity2.6
2.5Versatility2.5
2.7Controls & convenience7.8

Why is Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch better than 348113?

Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is 348113 better than Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  2. Non-stick coatingNo · Cecofry Essential Rapid MoonTouch: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

StarQ 348113StarQ 348113≈ US$354.4
Power & capacity
Power1,200 W1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—2.6 l
Automatic programmes8—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer30 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—314 mm
Height—265 mm
Depth—302 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare