- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Cecofry Advance 9000 Window vs DO536
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 Window vs Domo DO536
What Cecofry Advance 9000 Window does better (4) and where DO536 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Power & capacity6.5
2.5Versatility4.1
9.1Controls & convenience4.8
Why is Cecofry Advance 9000 Window better than DO536?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l vs 5.5 l+64%
- Power2,200 W vs 1,800 W+22%
- Viewing windowYes · DO536: No
- DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
Why is DO536 better than Cecofry Advance 9000 Window?
DO536 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,200 W | 1,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 9 l | 5.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 80 °C | — |
| Food capacity | — | 1.5 kg |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 30 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Width | — | 348 mm |
| Height | — | 448 mm |
| Depth | — | 405 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black, Silver |
Related comparisons
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 WindowvsMedion MD11760
8.48.3
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 WindowvsRussell Hobbs SatisFry Air Dual Basket 27290-56
8.48.9
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 WindowvsHaier HAF5TWA 011
8.48.6
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 WindowvsMidea MF-CY75AB
8.48.2
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 WindowvsDMS HFG-7
8.48.2
vs
Xiaomi BHR6942vsDomo DO536
6.16.2