- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- MC-200 RU vs T41/41 Tria
Catler MC-200 RU vs Remoska T41/41 Tria
What MC-200 RU does better (1) and where T41/41 Tria wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Power & capacity2.6
3.0Controls & convenience8.9
Why is MC-200 RU better than T41/41 Tria?
- Power860 W vs 610 W+41%
Why is T41/41 Tria better than MC-200 RU?
- Non-stick coatingNo · MC-200 RU: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 860 W | 610 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 5 l |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Steam | Cook, Steam, Slow cook, Bake |
| Pressure cooking | — | No |
| Slow cooking | — | Yes |
| Steaming | Yes | Yes |
| Sauté / sear | — | No |
| Sous-vide | — | No |
| Yoghurt programme | — | No |
| Air frying | — | No |
| Baking | — | Yes |
| Grill function | — | No |
| Dehydrating | — | No |
| Keep warm | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | — | Touchscreen |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Glass |
| Weight | — | 5.9 kg |
| Colours | Black | Black |
