- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- KM 1200 Chef vs KVC 3170 S
Caso KM 1200 Chef vs Kenwood KVC 3170 S
What KM 1200 Chef does better (4) and where KVC 3170 S wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Power & capacity3.8
9.2Versatility4.8
6.5Controls & convenience5.1
Why is KM 1200 Chef better than KVC 3170 S?
- Planetary mixing actionYes · KVC 3170 S: No
- Power1,200 W vs 1,000 W+20%
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l vs 4.6 l+20%
- Speed settings8 vs 6+33%
Why is KVC 3170 S better than KM 1200 Chef?
KVC 3170 S has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,200 W | 1,000 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5.5 l | 4.6 l |
| Speed settings | 8 | 6 |
| Max. dough per batch | 1.8 kg | — |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | Yes | No |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | No | — |
| Pulse function | Yes | Yes |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Heating / cooking function | No | No |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Food processor, Patisserie set | — |
| Number of accessories | 8 | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix, Crush ice, Blend | Knead |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | — |
| Timer | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Housing | Aluminium | — |
| Weight | 10.5 kg | — |
| Width | 445 mm | — |
| Height | 505 mm | — |
| Depth | 310 mm | — |
| Colours | Silver | Silver |
