2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AirFry Steam 700 vs NA350

Caso AirFry Steam 700 vs Philips NA350

What AirFry Steam 700 does better (4) and where NA350 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Caso AirFry Steam 700
Caso · 2024AirFry Steam 700
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ US$150
vs
Philips NA350
Philips · 2024NA350
9.1Score
4 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
6.7Power & capacity8.6
8.9Versatility8.4
8.8Controls & convenience8.4

Why is AirFry Steam 700 better than NA350?

  1. SteamingYes · NA350: No
  2. Keep warmYes · NA350: No
  3. Viewing windowYes · NA350: No
  4. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is NA350 better than AirFry Steam 700?

  1. Power1,700 W vs 2,750 W+62%
  2. Baskets / cooking zones1 vs 22×
  3. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l vs 9 l+29%
  4. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA350Philips NA350≈ US$1409.1
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l9 l
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Steam, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Keep warmCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Reheat
SteamingYesNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones12
Sync / match finish—No
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Height—444 mm
Depth—314 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare