2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 200 vs Vortx T17174

Caso AF 200 vs Tower Vortx T17174

What AF 200 does better (2) and where Vortx T17174 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 200
Caso · 2015AF 200
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$50
vs
Tower Vortx T17174
6.2Score
4 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
2.9Power & capacity3.1
5.2Versatility6.9
5.6Controls & convenience9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 200Vortx T17174
279 × 337313250 × 278366
AF 200Vortx T17174Difference
Height337 mm278 mm+59 mm
Width279 mm250 mm+29 mm
Depth313 mm366 mm−53 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 200 better than Vortx T17174?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,300 W+8%
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD

Why is Vortx T17174 better than AF 200?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l vs 4 l+60%
  2. Grill functionNo · AF 200: Yes
  3. Keep warmNo · AF 200: Yes
  4. Viewing windowNo · AF 200: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 200Caso AF 200≈ US$504.4
Tower Vortx T17174Tower Vortx T17174≈ US$656.2
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l4 l
Automatic programmes6—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature60 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry—
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingNo—
HousingStainless steel—
Width279 mm250 mm
Height337 mm278 mm
Depth313 mm366 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare