2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 200 vs Vortx T17147

Caso AF 200 vs Tower Vortx T17147

What AF 200 does better (0) and where Vortx T17147 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 200
Caso · 2015AF 200
4.4Score
0 advantages≈ US$50
vs
Tower Vortx T17147
6.5Score
5 advantages≈ US$50
Higher score
2.9Power & capacity5.2
5.2Versatility6.9
5.6Controls & convenience6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 200Vortx T17147
279 × 337313258 × 344287
AF 200Vortx T17147Difference
Height337 mm344 mm−7 mm
Width279 mm258 mm+21 mm
Depth313 mm287 mm+26 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 200 better than Vortx T17147?

AF 200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Vortx T17147 better than AF 200?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l vs 4.2 l+68%
  2. Automatic programmes6 vs 11+83%
  3. BakingNo · AF 200: Yes
  4. Keep warmNo · AF 200: Yes
  5. Non-stick coatingNo · AF 200: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 200Caso AF 200≈ US$504.4
Tower Vortx T17147Tower Vortx T17147≈ US$506.5
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes611
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature60 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry—
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingStainless steel—
Cord length—0.8 m
Width279 mm258 mm
Height337 mm344 mm
Depth313 mm287 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare