2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 200 vs Aerofryer XL 182020

Caso AF 200 vs Princess Aerofryer XL 182020

What AF 200 does better (2) and where Aerofryer XL 182020 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 200
Caso · 2015AF 200
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$50
vs
Princess Aerofryer XL 182020
Princess · 2015Aerofryer XL 182020
5.7Score
6 advantages≈ US$95
Higher score
2.9Power & capacity3.1
5.2Versatility7.7
5.6Controls & convenience7.8

Why is AF 200 better than Aerofryer XL 182020?

  1. TimerYes · Aerofryer XL 182020: No
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is Aerofryer XL 182020 better than AF 200?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AF 200: Yes
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l vs 3.2 l+28%
  3. Power1,400 W vs 1,500 W+7%
  4. Automatic programmes6 vs 8+33%
  5. BakingNo · AF 200: Yes
  6. Grill functionNo · AF 200: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 200Caso AF 200≈ US$504.4
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l3.2 l
Automatic programmes68
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Min. temperature60 °C—
Food capacity—0.8 kg
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesNo
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width279 mm—
Height337 mm—
Depth313 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare