- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AF 200 vs 9-in-1 Touch
Caso AF 200 vs Monzana 9-in-1 Touch
What AF 200 does better (2) and where 9-in-1 Touch wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Power & capacity3.8
5.2Versatility7.0
5.6Controls & convenience7.2
Why is AF 200 better than 9-in-1 Touch?
- DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
- Min. temperature60 °C vs 80 °C+33%
Why is 9-in-1 Touch better than AF 200?
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AF 200: Yes
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l vs 3.6 l+44%
- Power1,400 W vs 1,500 W+7%
- BakingNo · AF 200: Yes
- Grill functionNo · AF 200: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,400 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 2.5 l | 3.6 l |
| Automatic programmes | 6 | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 60 °C | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Max. timer | 60 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Width | 279 mm | — |
| Height | 337 mm | — |
| Depth | 313 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
