3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 3000 AirFry Chef 1700 vs AeroVital Cube Chef

Caso 3000 AirFry Chef 1700 vs Klarstein AeroVital Cube Chef

What 3000 AirFry Chef 1700 does better (3) and where AeroVital Cube Chef wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caso 3000 AirFry Chef 1700
9.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$140
vs
Klarstein AeroVital Cube Chef
Klarstein · 2020AeroVital Cube Chef
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
9.5Power & capacity9.6
9.3Versatility8.4
4.3Controls & convenience8.3

Why is 3000 AirFry Chef 1700 better than AeroVital Cube Chef?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)22 l vs 14 l+57%
  2. Keep warmYes · AeroVital Cube Chef: No
  3. Max. temperature230 °C vs 220 °C+5%

Why is AeroVital Cube Chef better than 3000 AirFry Chef 1700?

  1. Automatic programmes12 vs 16+33%
  2. DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)22 l14 l
Automatic programmes1216
Max. temperature230 °C220 °C
Min. temperature—50 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Rotating basket / rotisserieYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDTouchscreen
TimerNo—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width—330 mm
Height—385 mm
Depth—375 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare