- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- MUM58364 vs KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker
Bosch MUM58364 vs Kenwood KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker
What MUM58364 does better (2) and where KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Power & capacity5.1
7.8Versatility3.9
5.1Controls & convenience6.6
Why is MUM58364 better than KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker?
- Planetary mixing actionYes · KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker: No
- Number of accessories5 vs 4+25%
Why is KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker better than MUM58364?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.9 l vs 5 l+28%
- Power1,000 W vs 1,200 W+20%
- TimerNo · MUM58364: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,000 W | 1,200 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 3.9 l | 5 l |
| Speed settings | 7 | — |
| Max. dough per batch | — | 2.2 kg |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | Yes | No |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | — | No |
| Pulse function | No | No |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Built-in scale | — | Yes |
| Heating / cooking function | — | No |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook, Mincer | Whisk, Dough hook, Scale |
| Number of accessories | 5 | 4 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | — | Knead, Whisk, Mix, Blend |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | — | LCD |
| Timer | No | Yes |
| App control | — | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | — |
| Width | 280 mm | — |
| Height | 282 mm | — |
| Depth | 271 mm | — |
| Colours | Silver | Silver |
| Series | — | Kenwood Chef Baker |
Related comparisons
vs
KitchenAid 5KSM95vsBosch MUM58364
4.64.9
vs
Bosch MUM58364vsKenwood KVC5300
4.95.2
vs
KitchenAid 5KSM95vsKenwood KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker
4.65.3
vs
Kenwood KWL90 Chef XLvsKenwood KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker
9.45.3
vs
Kenwood KVL85 Titanium Chef Baker XLvsKenwood KVC85 Titanium Chef Baker
8.05.3
vs
Kenwood KVC85 Titanium Chef BakervsKitchenAid Artisan Mini 5KSM3311
5.34.2