2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FX 400 vs Kult

Black+Decker FX 400 vs WMF Kult

What FX 400 does better (0) and where Kult wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Black+Decker FX 400
Black+Decker · 2014FX 400
4.0Score
0 advantages≈ US$65
vs
WMF Kult
WMF · 2013Kult
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
2.6Power & capacity3.0
5.4Versatility8.3
4.8Controls & convenience5.8

Why is FX 400 better than Kult?

FX 400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Kult better than FX 400?

  1. Power400 W vs 500 W+25%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)1.2 l vs 1.5 l+25%
  3. Pulse functionNo · FX 400: Yes
  4. Number of accessories5 vs 6+20%
Specifications

Side by side

WMF KultWMF Kult≈ US$1305.9
Power & capacity
Power400 W500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)1.2 l1.5 l
Speed settings22
Mixing & processing
Pulse functionNoYes
Soft startNoNo
Bowl materialPlastic—
Attachments includedSpatulaSlicing discs, Spatula
Number of accessories56
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Chop, Crush ice, BlendKnead, Whisk, Mix, Chop, Slice, Crush ice
Controls & smart
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Housing—Stainless steel
Cord storageYesYes
Weight—4.6 kg
Width—275 mm
Height—410 mm
Depth—195 mm
ColoursWhiteSilver
Series—WMF Kult
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare