2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FX 400 vs Multipro Compact FDM301SS

Black+Decker FX 400 vs Kenwood Multipro Compact FDM301SS

What FX 400 does better (1) and where Multipro Compact FDM301SS wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Black+Decker FX 400
Black+Decker · 2014FX 400
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$65
vs
Kenwood Multipro Compact FDM301SS
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$100
Higher score
2.6Power & capacity4.8
5.4Versatility3.6
4.8Controls & convenience3.1

Why is FX 400 better than Multipro Compact FDM301SS?

  1. Number of accessories5 vs 15×

Why is Multipro Compact FDM301SS better than FX 400?

  1. Power400 W vs 800 W2×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)1.2 l vs 2.1 l+75%
  3. Pulse functionNo · FX 400: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power400 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)1.2 l2.1 l
Speed settings2—
Mixing & processing
Pulse functionNoYes
Soft startNoNo
Bowl materialPlasticPlastic
Attachments includedSpatula—
Number of accessories51
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Chop, Crush ice, BlendKnead, Whisk, Mix, Chop, Slice, Crush ice, Blend
Controls & smart
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Cord storageYes—
ColoursWhiteSilver
Series—Kenwood Multipro Compact
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare