2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Dual Basket BXAF9000E vs AF1703XD

Black+Decker Dual Basket BXAF9000E vs Taurus AF1703XD

What Dual Basket BXAF9000E does better (2) and where AF1703XD wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Black+Decker Dual Basket BXAF9000E
Black+Decker · 2025Dual Basket BXAF9000E
2 advantages≈ US$110
vs
Taurus AF1703XD
Taurus · 2025AF1703XD
8.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$110
Higher score
8.9Power & capacity9.3

Why is Dual Basket BXAF9000E better than AF1703XD?

  1. Power2,500 W vs 2,100 W+19%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l vs 8 l+12%

Why is AF1703XD better than Dual Basket BXAF9000E?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Taurus AF1703XDTaurus AF1703XD≈ US$1108.8
Power & capacity
Power2,500 W2,100 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l8 l
Automatic programmes—12
Max. temperature190 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
Steaming—No
Baking—No
Grill function—No
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
Design & build
HousingPlasticMetal
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare