2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. BXAF6500E vs NA211

Black+Decker BXAF6500E vs Philips NA211

What BXAF6500E does better (4) and where NA211 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Black+Decker BXAF6500E
Black+Decker · 2024BXAF6500E
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
vs
Philips NA211
Philips · 2024NA211
3.9Score
0 advantages≈ US$110
7.0Power & capacity2.9
2.5Versatility4.1
7.0Controls & convenience2.7

Why is BXAF6500E better than NA211?

  1. Power1,800 W vs 1,300 W+38%
  2. Food capacity1.3 kg vs 0.4 kg3.2×
  3. Viewing windowYes · NA211: No
  4. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)

Why is NA211 better than BXAF6500E?

NA211 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA211Philips NA211≈ US$1103.9
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—3.2 l
Automatic programmes8—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Food capacity1.3 kg0.4 kg
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare