2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. P102SBA550 vs Mastic

Beper P102SBA550 vs Lehmann Mastic

What P102SBA550 does better (2) and where Mastic wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Beper P102SBA550
Beper · 2024P102SBA550
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$140
vs
Lehmann Mastic
Lehmann · 2025Mastic
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$120
Higher score
9.2Power & capacity6.5
2.3Controls & convenience3.7

Why is P102SBA550 better than Mastic?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l vs 5 l+40%
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,300 W+15%

Why is Mastic better than P102SBA550?

  1. Heating / cooking functionNo · P102SBA550: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Beper P102SBA550Beper P102SBA550≈ US$1405.6
Lehmann MasticLehmann Mastic≈ US$1205.9
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l5 l
Mixing & processing
Heating / cooking functionNoYes
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedSplash guard—
Number of accessories1—
Cooking modes
FunctionsKneadKnead, Mix, Blend, Cook
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Weight6.5 kg—
Width417 mm—
Height376 mm—
Depth278 mm—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare