3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. HL-126 vs Vizion Eco Saver T17116

Balter HL-126 vs Tower Vizion Eco Saver T17116

What HL-126 does better (2) and where Vizion Eco Saver T17116 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Balter HL-126
Balter · 2018HL-126
6.1Score
2 advantages≈ US$65
vs
Tower Vizion Eco Saver T17116
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
3.4Power & capacity2.6
6.9Versatility5.4
8.9Controls & convenience9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

HL-126Vizion Eco Saver T17116
260 × 310260335 × 315315
HL-126Vizion Eco Saver T17116Difference
Height310 mm315 mm−5 mm
Width260 mm335 mm−75 mm
Depth260 mm315 mm−55 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HL-126 better than Vizion Eco Saver T17116?

  1. Power1,500 W vs 1,350 W+11%
  2. Grill functionYes · Vizion Eco Saver T17116: No

Why is Vizion Eco Saver T17116 better than HL-126?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.7 l vs 4 l+48%
  2. Viewing windowNo · HL-126: Yes
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Balter HL-126Balter HL-126≈ US$656.1
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,350 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.7 l4 l
Automatic programmes—6
Max. temperature200 °C—
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNo—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYes—
Max. timer30 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingStainless steel—
Width260 mm335 mm
Height310 mm315 mm
Depth260 mm315 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare