2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. HL-126 vs Easy Fry Classic EY2018

Balter HL-126 vs Tefal Easy Fry Classic EY2018

What HL-126 does better (2) and where Easy Fry Classic EY2018 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Balter HL-126
Balter · 2018HL-126
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
vs
Tefal Easy Fry Classic EY2018
5.5Score
0 advantages≈ US$60
3.4Power & capacity4.1
7.1Versatility7.1
8.8Controls & convenience4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

HL-126Easy Fry Classic EY2018
260 × 310260326 × 391326
HL-126Easy Fry Classic EY2018Difference
Height310 mm391 mm−81 mm
Width260 mm326 mm−66 mm
Depth260 mm326 mm−66 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HL-126 better than Easy Fry Classic EY2018?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Easy Fry Classic EY2018: No
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,400 W+7%

Why is Easy Fry Classic EY2018 better than HL-126?

Easy Fry Classic EY2018 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Balter HL-126Balter HL-126≈ US$656.2
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.7 l—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer30 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width260 mm326 mm
Height310 mm391 mm
Depth260 mm326 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Series—Tefal Easy Fry
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare