- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AR2091-0400 vs PHAF
Arzum AR2091-0400 vs Philco PHAF
What AR2091-0400 does better (2) and where PHAF wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Power & capacity5.8
6.7Controls & convenience4.3
Why is AR2091-0400 better than PHAF?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 5.5 l+9%
- Non-stick coatingYes · PHAF: No
Why is PHAF better than AR2091-0400?
- Power1,750 W vs 2,100 W+20%
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,750 W | 2,100 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6 l | 5.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 6 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | — |
| Baking | No | — |
| Grill function | No | — |
| Dehydrating | No | — |
| Keep warm | No | — |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | LCD |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | White |
