- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AMPF9 vs HL-2200
Arthur Martin AMPF9 vs Balter HL-2200
What AMPF9 does better (1) and where HL-2200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is AMPF9 better than HL-2200?
- Power2,000 W vs 1,800 W+11%
Why is HL-2200 better than AMPF9?
- Non-stick coatingNo · AMPF9: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,000 W | 1,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 9 l | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 80 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Roast, Reheat | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LED | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 60 min | 90 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Metal | Stainless steel |
| Width | — | 410 mm |
| Height | — | 370 mm |
| Depth | — | 350 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Black, Silver |
