2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Vintage vs AF200

Ariete Vintage vs Ninja AF200

What Vintage does better (4) and where AF200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Ariete Vintage
Ariete · 2024Vintage
6.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$120
vs
Ninja AF200
Ninja · 2025AF200
7.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
7.9Power & capacity7.9
6.6Versatility8.4
2.7Controls & convenience3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

VintageAF200
340 × 340340380 × 315470
VintageAF200Difference
Height340 mm315 mm+25 mm
Width340 mm380 mm−40 mm
Depth340 mm470 mm−130 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vintage better than AF200?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)16 l vs 7.6 l2.1×
  2. Max. temperature230 °C vs 190 °C+21%
  3. BakingYes · AF200: No
  4. TimerYes · AF200: No

Why is AF200 better than Vintage?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 2,400 W+71%
  2. Baskets / cooking zones1 vs 22×
  3. Non-stick coatingNo · Vintage: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Ariete VintageAriete Vintage≈ US$1206.9
Ninja AF200Ninja AF200≈ US$1407.5
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)16 l7.6 l
Max. temperature230 °C190 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, BakeCook, Air fry, Roast, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones12
Sync / match finish—Yes
Viewing windowNo—
Rotating basket / rotisserieYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesNo
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width340 mm380 mm
Height340 mm315 mm
Depth340 mm470 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare