- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- RoboMix compact 1769 vs FX 400
Ariete RoboMix compact 1769 vs Black+Decker FX 400
What RoboMix compact 1769 does better (2) and where FX 400 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.3Power & capacity2.7
7.3Versatility5.3
Why is RoboMix compact 1769 better than FX 400?
- Power500 W vs 400 W+25%
- Pulse functionYes · FX 400: No
Why is FX 400 better than RoboMix compact 1769?
FX 400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 500 W | 400 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 1.2 l |
| Speed settings | 2 | 2 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Pulse function | Yes | No |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Bowl material | — | Plastic |
| Attachments included | — | Spatula |
| Number of accessories | — | 5 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Chop, Slice, Crush ice | Knead, Chop, Crush ice, Blend |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Timer | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Housing | Plastic | — |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Colours | White | White |
| Series | Ariete Robomix | — |
