- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- RoboMix compact 1769 vs FX 400
Ariete RoboMix compact 1769 vs Black+Decker FX 400
What RoboMix compact 1769 does better (2) and where FX 400 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.3Power & capacity2.6
7.2Versatility5.4
Why is RoboMix compact 1769 better than FX 400?
- Power500 W vs 400 W+25%
- Pulse functionYes · FX 400: No
Why is FX 400 better than RoboMix compact 1769?
FX 400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 500 W | 400 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 1.2 l |
| Speed settings | 2 | 2 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Pulse function | Yes | No |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Bowl material | — | Plastic |
| Attachments included | — | Spatula |
| Number of accessories | — | 5 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Chop, Slice, Crush ice | Knead, Chop, Crush ice, Blend |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Timer | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Housing | Plastic | — |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Colours | White | White |
| Series | Ariete Robomix | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Kenwood Multipro Compact FDM307SSvsAriete RoboMix compact 1769
6.85.4
vs
Russell Hobbs Compact Home MinivsAriete RoboMix compact 1769
6.65.4
vs
Ariete RoboMix compact 1769vsGirmi RB15
5.44.1
vs
Ariete RoboMix compact 1769vsKenwood Multipro Compact FDM301SS
5.44.3
vs
Ariete RoboMix compact 1769vsKitchenAid 5KFC3516
5.44.6