2,674 models · 447 brandsupdated 24 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Dual Zone vs AFT2100

Arendo Dual Zone vs Kalorik AFT2100

What Dual Zone does better (4) and where AFT2100 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Arendo Dual Zone
Arendo · 2026Dual Zone
7.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
vs
Kalorik AFT2100
Kalorik · 2026AFT2100
7.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
6.7Power & capacity6.3
7.2Versatility7.8
6.0Controls & convenience6.5

Why is Dual Zone better than AFT2100?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
  3. Non-stick coatingYes · AFT2100: No
  4. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is AFT2100 better than Dual Zone?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 6 l+20%
  2. BakingNo · Dual Zone: Yes
  3. Grill functionNo · Dual Zone: Yes
  4. Viewing windowNo · Dual Zone: Yes
  5. TimerNo · Dual Zone: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Arendo Dual ZoneArendo Dual Zone≈ US$857.4
Kalorik AFT2100Kalorik AFT2100≈ US$807.4
Power & capacity
Power2,000 W2,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l6 l
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, PizzaCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishYes—
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
TimerNoYes
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingStainless steelPlastic
ColoursBlack, SilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare