2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Dual Zone 307745 vs AF200

Arendo Dual Zone 307745 vs Ninja AF200

What Dual Zone 307745 does better (2) and where AF200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Arendo Dual Zone 307745
Arendo · 2025Dual Zone 307745
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
vs
Ninja AF200
Ninja · 2025AF200
7.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$140
Higher score
4.4Power & capacity7.9
9.2Versatility8.3
5.6Controls & convenience3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Dual Zone 307745AF200
395 × 305400380 × 315470
Dual Zone 307745AF200Difference
Height305 mm315 mm−10 mm
Width395 mm380 mm+15 mm
Depth400 mm470 mm−70 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Dual Zone 307745 better than AF200?

  1. DehydratingYes · AF200: No
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is AF200 better than Dual Zone 307745?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.5 l vs 7.6 l+69%
Specifications

Side by side

Ninja AF200Ninja AF200≈ US$1407.6
Power & capacity
Power2,400 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.5 l7.6 l
Automatic programmes3—
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, DehydrateCook, Air fry, Roast, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones22
Sync / match finishYesYes
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width395 mm380 mm
Height305 mm315 mm
Depth400 mm470 mm
ColoursWhite, Black, SilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare