3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Smart Cube vs BXAF1200E

Aigostar Smart Cube vs Black+Decker BXAF1200E

What Smart Cube does better (2) and where BXAF1200E wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Aigostar Smart Cube
Aigostar · 2021Smart Cube
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
vs
Black+Decker BXAF1200E
Black+Decker · 2022BXAF1200E
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$100
5.3Power & capacity6.5
4.1Versatility4.1
6.6Controls & convenience3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Smart CubeBXAF1200E
318 × 346416320 × 375330
Smart CubeBXAF1200EDifference
Height346 mm375 mm−29 mm
Width318 mm320 mm−2 mm
Depth416 mm330 mm+86 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Smart Cube better than BXAF1200E?

  1. Power1,900 W vs 1,700 W+12%
  2. TimerYes · BXAF1200E: No

Why is BXAF1200E better than Smart Cube?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l vs 12 l+71%
  2. Automatic programmes7 vs 8+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Aigostar Smart CubeAigostar Smart Cube≈ US$1105.8
Power & capacity
Power1,900 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l12 l
Automatic programmes78
Max. temperature180 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesNo
Max. timer60 min—
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width318 mm320 mm
Height346 mm375 mm
Depth416 mm330 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare