- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Hayden 201289 vs Cecofry Compact Rapid Moon
Aigostar Hayden 201289 vs Cecotec Cecofry Compact Rapid Moon
What Hayden 201289 does better (3) and where Cecofry Compact Rapid Moon wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Power & capacity2.4
2.5Versatility4.1
4.7Controls & convenience2.7
Why is Hayden 201289 better than Cecofry Compact Rapid Moon?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.5 l vs 1.5 l2.3×
- Power1,500 W vs 900 W+67%
- Non-stick coatingYes · Cecofry Compact Rapid Moon: No
Why is Cecofry Compact Rapid Moon better than Hayden 201289?
Cecofry Compact Rapid Moon has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 900 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 3.5 l | 1.5 l |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 80 °C | — |
| Food capacity | — | 0.4 kg |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 30 min | 30 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 350 mm | — |
| Height | 335 mm | — |
| Depth | 285 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
