- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Touch vs AF250
aeco Touch vs TurboTronic AF250
What Touch does better (1) and where AF250 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Touch better than AF250?
- Power1,700 W vs 1,500 W+13%
Why is AF250 better than Touch?
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Touch: Yes
- Automatic programmes8 vs 12+50%
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.7 l vs 6 l+5%
- DehydratingNo · Touch: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,700 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5.7 l | 6 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 12 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | Yes |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | — |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Height | 280 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
