2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Touch vs MF-136

aeco Touch vs Melchioni MF-136

What Touch does better (0) and where MF-136 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

aeco Touch
aeco · 2025Touch
7.0Score
0 advantages≈ US$65
vs
Melchioni MF-136
Melchioni · 2025MF-136
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$70
Higher score
5.2Power & capacity7.1
7.7Versatility7.0
7.4Controls & convenience9.1

Why is Touch better than MF-136?

Touch has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is MF-136 better than Touch?

  1. Power1,700 W vs 2,000 W+18%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.7 l vs 6.5 l+14%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  4. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

aeco Touchaeco Touch≈ US$657.0
Melchioni MF-136Melchioni MF-136≈ US$708.6
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W2,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.7 l6.5 l
Automatic programmes88
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticMetal
Width—350 mm
Height280 mm340 mm
Depth—280 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare