- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Touch vs HAF651650BCU
aeco Touch vs Hanseatic HAF651650BCU
What Touch does better (6) and where HAF651650BCU wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Power & capacity6.9
7.7Versatility6.1
7.4Controls & convenience3.1
Why is Touch better than HAF651650BCU?
- Power1,700 W vs 1,650 W+3%
- BakingYes · HAF651650BCU: No
- Grill functionYes · HAF651650BCU: No
- Viewing windowYes · HAF651650BCU: No
- TimerYes · HAF651650BCU: No
- Non-stick coatingYes · HAF651650BCU: No
Why is HAF651650BCU better than Touch?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.7 l vs 6.5 l+14%
- Automatic programmes8 vs 10+25%
- Keep warmNo · Touch: Yes
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,700 W | 1,650 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5.7 l | 6.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 10 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Air fry, Keep warm |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | Yes |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Height | 280 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
