- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Touch vs ITFBM1-wcshuliang
aeco Touch vs Aigostar ITFBM1-wcshuliang
What Touch does better (4) and where ITFBM1-wcshuliang wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Power & capacity5.7
7.7Versatility6.1
7.4Controls & convenience6.4
Why is Touch better than ITFBM1-wcshuliang?
- BakingYes · ITFBM1-wcshuliang: No
- Grill functionYes · ITFBM1-wcshuliang: No
- Viewing windowYes · ITFBM1-wcshuliang: No
- Automatic programmes8 vs 7+14%
Why is ITFBM1-wcshuliang better than Touch?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.7 l vs 7 l+23%
- Power1,700 W vs 1,900 W+12%
- Keep warmNo · Touch: Yes
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,700 W | 1,900 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5.7 l | 7 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 7 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Cook, Air fry, Keep warm |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | Yes |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| App control | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Height | 280 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
