3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 12 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CUBE 2.0 vs FR-9014

aeco CUBE 2.0 vs Tristar FR-9014

What CUBE 2.0 does better (3) and where FR-9014 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

aeco CUBE 2.0
aeco · 2025CUBE 2.0
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$45
Higher score
vs
Tristar FR-9014
Tristar · 2024FR-9014
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$45
2.2Power & capacity3.2
7.6Versatility4.1
6.1Controls & convenience2.7

Why is CUBE 2.0 better than FR-9014?

  1. BakingYes · FR-9014: No
  2. Grill functionYes · FR-9014: No
  3. Non-stick coatingYes · FR-9014: No

Why is FR-9014 better than CUBE 2.0?

  1. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

aeco CUBE 2.0aeco CUBE 2.0≈ US$454.4
Tristar FR-9014Tristar FR-9014≈ US$454.0
Power & capacity
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l2 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width218 mm—
Depth290 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare