- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- CUBE 2.0 vs MA-300
aeco CUBE 2.0 vs Mestic MA-300
What CUBE 2.0 does better (0) and where MA-300 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is CUBE 2.0 better than MA-300?
CUBE 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MA-300 better than CUBE 2.0?
MA-300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 900 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 2 l | 2 l |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | — |
| Baking | Yes | — |
| Grill function | Yes | — |
| Dehydrating | No | — |
| Keep warm | No | — |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Max. timer | 60 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | — |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | — |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 218 mm | — |
| Depth | 290 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
