2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CUBE 2.0 vs 16539

aeco CUBE 2.0 vs GOURMETmaxx 16539

What CUBE 2.0 does better (1) and where 16539 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

aeco CUBE 2.0
aeco · 2025CUBE 2.0
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$35
vs
GOURMETmaxx 16539
GOURMETmaxx · 202516539
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$30
Higher score
2.3Power & capacity4.5
7.7Versatility7.7
6.1Controls & convenience8.2

Why is CUBE 2.0 better than 16539?

  1. Non-stick coatingYes · 16539: No

Why is 16539 better than CUBE 2.0?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l vs 5 l2.5×
  2. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  3. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

aeco CUBE 2.0aeco CUBE 2.0≈ US$354.4
GOURMETmaxx 16539GOURMETmaxx 16539≈ US$306.7
Power & capacity
Power—1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l5 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width218 mm250 mm
Height—300 mm
Depth290 mm365 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare