2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CUBE 2.0 vs 15198

aeco CUBE 2.0 vs GOURMETmaxx 15198

What CUBE 2.0 does better (1) and where 15198 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

aeco CUBE 2.0
aeco · 2025CUBE 2.0
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$35
vs
GOURMETmaxx 15198
GOURMETmaxx · 202515198
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$35
Higher score
2.3Power & capacity3.2
7.7Versatility8.9
6.1Controls & convenience6.6

Why is CUBE 2.0 better than 15198?

  1. Non-stick coatingYes · 15198: No

Why is 15198 better than CUBE 2.0?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l vs 4 l2×
  2. Keep warmNo · CUBE 2.0: Yes
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

aeco CUBE 2.0aeco CUBE 2.0≈ US$354.4
GOURMETmaxx 15198GOURMETmaxx 15198≈ US$355.9
Power & capacity
Power—1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l4 l
Automatic programmes—8
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Width218 mm277 mm
Height—310 mm
Depth290 mm395 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare