3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CUBE 2.0 vs 8711252574332

aeco CUBE 2.0 vs Alpina 8711252574332

What CUBE 2.0 does better (1) and where 8711252574332 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

aeco CUBE 2.0
aeco · 2025CUBE 2.0
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$45
Higher score
vs
Alpina 8711252574332
Alpina · 20258711252574332
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$50
2.2Power & capacity2.2
7.6Versatility6.1

Why is CUBE 2.0 better than 8711252574332?

  1. Grill functionYes · 8711252574332: No

Why is 8711252574332 better than CUBE 2.0?

8711252574332 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

aeco CUBE 2.0aeco CUBE 2.0≈ US$454.4
Power & capacity
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l2 l
Automatic programmes—3
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillCook, Air fry, Bake
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYes—
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width218 mm—
Depth290 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare