3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Compact vs 58695

aeco Compact vs Unold 58695

What Compact does better (2) and where 58695 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

aeco Compact
aeco · 2024Compact
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$60
vs
Unold 58695
Unold · 202458695
5.7Score
5 advantages≈ US$60
Higher score
3.2Power & capacity3.3
7.6Versatility9.4
6.1Controls & convenience3.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Compact58695
264 × 306240 × 293
Compact58695Difference
Height306 mm293 mm+13 mm
Width264 mm240 mm+24 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Compact better than 58695?

  1. Power1,500 W vs 1,200 W+25%
  2. Non-stick coatingYes · 58695: No

Why is 58695 better than Compact?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 4.5 l+5%
  2. DehydratingNo · Compact: Yes
  3. Keep warmNo · Compact: Yes
  4. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
  5. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

aeco Compactaeco Compact≈ US$605.2
Unold 58695Unold 58695≈ US$605.7
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l4.5 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—65 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width264 mm240 mm
Height306 mm293 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare