- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Compact vs FRH 1500
aeco Compact vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1500
What Compact does better (0) and where FRH 1500 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Compact better than FRH 1500?
Compact has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FRH 1500 better than Compact?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 5 l+16%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.3 l | 5 l |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 65 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Width | 264 mm | — |
| Height | 306 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Black |
