- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Compact vs NA229
aeco Compact vs Philips NA229
What Compact does better (1) and where NA229 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CompactNA229
| Compact | NA229 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 306 mm | 292 mm | +14 mm |
| Width | 264 mm | 273 mm | −9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Compact better than NA229?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 4.2 l+2%
Why is NA229 better than Compact?
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Compact: Yes
- Keep warmNo · Compact: Yes
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.3 l | 4.2 l |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | Yes |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 264 mm | 273 mm |
| Height | 306 mm | 292 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
