- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Compact vs MF-TN35D2
aeco Compact vs Midea MF-TN35D2
What Compact does better (1) and where MF-TN35D2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CompactMF-TN35D2
| Compact | MF-TN35D2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 306 mm | 260 mm | +46 mm |
| Width | 264 mm | 350 mm | −86 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Compact better than MF-TN35D2?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 3.2 l+34%
Why is MF-TN35D2 better than Compact?
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.3 l | 3.2 l |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 264 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 306 mm | 260 mm |
| Depth | — | 306 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
