2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Compact vs FRY 7320

aeco Compact vs Grundig FRY 7320

What Compact does better (2) and where FRY 7320 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

aeco Compact
aeco · 2024Compact
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$60
vs
Grundig FRY 7320
Grundig · 2024FRY 7320
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$60
Higher score
3.2Power & capacity5.9
7.7Versatility4.1
6.1Controls & convenience7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

CompactFRY 7320
264 × 306410 × 316360
CompactFRY 7320Difference
Height306 mm316 mm−10 mm
Width264 mm410 mm−146 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Compact better than FRY 7320?

  1. BakingYes · FRY 7320: No
  2. Grill functionYes · FRY 7320: No

Why is FRY 7320 better than Compact?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 7.6 l+77%
  2. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

aeco Compactaeco Compact≈ US$605.3
Grundig FRY 7320Grundig FRY 7320≈ US$606.4
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l7.6 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, ReheatAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width264 mm410 mm
Height306 mm316 mm
Depth—360 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare