- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Compact vs FR 6502
aeco Compact vs Exquisit FR 6502
What Compact does better (3) and where FR 6502 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CompactFR 6502
| Compact | FR 6502 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 306 mm | 265 mm | +41 mm |
| Width | 264 mm | 260 mm | +4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Compact better than FR 6502?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 3.5 l+23%
- Power1,500 W vs 1,300 W+15%
- Grill functionYes · FR 6502: No
Why is FR 6502 better than Compact?
FR 6502 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,300 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.3 l | 3.5 l |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Air fry, Bake, Roast |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | — |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | — |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 264 mm | 260 mm |
| Height | 306 mm | 265 mm |
| Depth | — | 330 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
