- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Compact vs FR2500
aeco Compact vs Concept FR2500
What Compact does better (4) and where FR2500 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CompactFR2500
| Compact | FR2500 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 306 mm | 300 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 264 mm | 235 mm | +29 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Compact better than FR2500?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 2.5 l+72%
- Power1,500 W vs 1,200 W+25%
- BakingYes · FR2500: No
- Grill functionYes · FR2500: No
Why is FR2500 better than Compact?
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,200 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.3 l | 2.5 l |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 264 mm | 235 mm |
| Height | 306 mm | 300 mm |
| Depth | — | 287 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
