- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Compact vs Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
aeco Compact vs Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
What Compact does better (5) and where Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Power & capacity4.5
7.7Versatility2.5
6.1Controls & convenience5.6
Why is Compact better than Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 4 l+7%
- Power1,500 W vs 1,400 W+7%
- BakingYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
- Grill functionYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
- Non-stick coatingYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
Why is Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 better than Compact?
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,400 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.3 l | 4 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 9 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 264 mm | — |
| Height | 306 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
